bironic: Neil Perry gazing out a window at night (Default)
[personal profile] bironic
Anne Rice's book about Jesus has hit the shelves. I report this because I adore her first three(ish) Vampire Chronicles and maintain that she should have quit there, even with the occasional good bits in the rest of the books, before the eccentricity that has culminated in Christ the Lord: Out of Egypt took over.

For years Rice, who grew up with an alcoholic mother prone to severe depressive episodes, stressed that she was unhappy with her Catholic upbringing and had been estranged from the church; when she wrote Interview with the Vampire she was also deep in grief over the death of her very young daughter (resurrected and cut down once more in the form of the vampire Claudia), whom she lost to cancer, and questioning her faith. For me one of the attractions of that book was the vampires' desperate attempt to understand their place in a world they could no longer interact with, where they felt damned without even the cold comfort of knowing there was a Being to orchestrate or witness their damnation. Some of the vampires considered themselves gods on Earth. The millennia-old vampires were unapologetic pagans. The agnosticism was appealing, as was the characters' ability to be preoccupied with other problems at the same time.

As the series progressed and the divine became more of an obsession for Rice/Lestat, the characters lost much of their original interest (always a risk of sequels, true; and there were certainly other factors that contributed to the demise of the series). Louis searching for meaning and definite proof or disproof of the existence of a higher power was one thing; Armand's weakness for religious fervour and cultism started to push it; Lestat meeting God and the Devil and travelling back in time to the Crucifixion and going mad while his cohorts lined up to immolate themselves before Veronica's Veil was a little more than I could stomach. Some of her other books that I'd read went just as far, if not further -- Servant of the Bones comes to mind, chockablock with references to Yahweh, St. Sebastian and ladders to white light (not to mention traumatising images of what it's like to be raised by a negligent alcoholic) -- but it never irked me as much as it did in the Chronicles; that's probably because, as one of my co-workers would say, that sort of thing isn't what I signed up for when I started the series. Nothing wrong with religious themes, if that's your thing, but the way it worked in the Chronicles, especially after she was well on her way to establishing her own mythology within the text, it was as if a second author joined the team halfway through and decided that there needed to be answers of a Judeo-Christian sort.

Now, citing her near-death experience & epiphany following a diabetic coma a few years ago, Anne Rice has embraced her faith and written the first of a series of books about Jesus -- a literal Jesus rather than a metaphorical or fictional one this time. About ten years too late, if you ask me; I might have enjoyed more of the Chronicles if she hadn't decided to write the equivalent of Lestat Does Dante or spend two books rambling about how the young Armand was a fanatical cave-dwelling icon- (sorry, ikon-) painter in Russia who now, instead of staring wide-eyed at kitchen gadgets and spending barely comprehensible amounts of money and seducing men like Daniel, hallucinates about the Santa Sofia. Christ the Lord: Out of Egypt is apparently non-fiction and doubtless is as thoroughly researched as her novels were. At first I was going to blow it off as the late-career indulgence of an aging woman who's always been slightly off-kilter and who's lost not only a daughter but also, more recently, her poet husband. But it also seems that she's sincerely into her subject and, even better, has after 30 years ditched her purple prose in favor of a style Newsday (grain of salt) compares to Hemingway.

I guess we wait for the reviews.

Date: Nov. 23rd, 2005 09:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kabal42.livejournal.com
I have my sincere doubts about "Rice does Jesus". I hope, sort of - for her sake, that she actually did the subject justice, but I already know that I will not read this book.
I quit after the first two vampire books and as such I think it's pretty obvious that I am not a fan ;-) Somehow, the woman who wrote all these books on the supernatural as well as some rather racy books with BDSM content (which usually reliable sources tells me are quite good) seem unlikely to suddenly write about Jesus, and is it quite unlikely that very many people will take her seriously. Her fans will probably not be interested and for the above reasons I doubt that large circles of Christians will replace them.

Date: Nov. 23rd, 2005 10:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maddy-harrigan.livejournal.com
As a Christian who writes and reads varying amounts of BDSM (and who has written a poem addressed to Christ using the metaphor of a submitting lover), I contest the claim that raciness and tying people up can't coexist happily with the Word of God. Witness Saint Sebastian. The Ecstacy of Saint Teresa. Etc.

Though I COMPLETELY agree that I think Anne Rice is a bit off her rocker, and am very very afraid of this new book.

Date: Nov. 23rd, 2005 10:24 pm (UTC)
ext_2047: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bironic.livejournal.com
Yes, that makes sense. To elaborate, I don't think this is simply (or only) a case of lacking faith in the ability of a novelist to do non-fiction. Rather, it's a matter of respecting the author in question. If Jonathan Lethem, one of my favorite fiction writers/essayists, came out with a book about Jesus, I'd go buy it because I like his style, respect his intelligence and value his insight. Or Michael Crichton -- there's a (primarily) fiction writer with superb research abilities who can and does write best-selling non-fiction.

But say J.K. Rowling decided to write a book about, I don't know, the history of alchemy (the equivalence of Rice's Jesus, being a non-fiction subject already plumbed for use in her fiction), after finishing Harry Potter and the Satisfaction Of Ending This Bloody Series So I Can Get On With My Career. Knowing how meticulously she planned and researched the Potter books, I'd bet her alchemy tome would be accurate. But I probably wouldn't read it. I like her characters but don't like her writing stylistically, and wouldn't be interested in what she has to say about the subject.

P.S. I tried one of the Beauty books (the ones you mention) once and didn't get very far. Maybe the scenarios and dynamics were good but it was hard not to laugh at all the panting and euphemisms.

Date: Nov. 23rd, 2005 10:27 pm (UTC)
ext_2047: (Default)
From: [identity profile] bironic.livejournal.com
Absolutely - there's a long history of religious ecstasy being expressed in sexual terms. The problem here is twofold: the general public mightn't see things the same way, and Anne Rice's issues go far beyond the fact that she wrote those romance novels. See below.

Date: Nov. 24th, 2005 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kabal42.livejournal.com
I should have anticipated that someone would read my words like you did and have been more clear. My apologies for coming off like that.
Let me just say right away that my "usually reliable source" is a Christian practitioner of BDSM, my best friend, and has, obviously, read those books.
This does not change the fact that SOME (and quite a few in my personal experience) religios people have a problem with freedom of expression when it comes to sexuality.
So please do not at all see this as something pertaining to Christians in general; that was never my intention.

Date: Nov. 24th, 2005 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kabal42.livejournal.com
I see your point here, and that probably is a large factor. I know that is why I will not read Rice's new book, despite the fascinating subject. I probably wouldn't read the hypthetical book by JKR. None of them are all that good writers in my opinion.
(Ok, I actually might read JKR's book, since I'm terribly curious as to her own use of alchemy and it might provide clues *S*)
This point is another reason why I do not believe it will sell all that well.

P.S. I never tried because I had a feeling I'd feel as you did. Despite that I love erotic fiction with BDSMish content *S*

Date: Nov. 25th, 2005 10:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catilinarian.livejournal.com
I must admit I picked up one of the Beauty books in a library a few years back, and what struck me more than anything was Rice's inability to get away from ELABORATE and FASCINATED and DROOLING descriptions of...

... the women's clothes.

There are ways in which, "Oh, you can tell the writer of this erotic volume is a woman," can be quite a compliment. This wasn't one of them.

Tags

Style Credit