RSL: I don’t have very many lines, so I will ham it up with my left eyebrow and sardonic delivery. And wear my super-sexy sweatervest.
HL: You’re only dressing up because you’re worried I’ll stop paying attention to you now that I’ve won all these awards for my brilliant acting talent.
RSL: ...
HL: You do look hot in it, though.
Hey, has anyone ever done an MST of an episode as a review? Like with House and Wilson providing commentary? That could be fun.
Ambivalent about tonight’s ep, in the same way I was ambivalent about “Words and Deeds”--not bad, not top-tier. The different format was way beyond due, so that was very nice, with everyone able to take their time and talk without a diagnostic clock ticking, and no last-minute miracle diagnosis to serve as a conclusion. It shared “Son of Coma Guy”’s focus on conversation and character revelation, only here I had a harder time telling what was profound and what made absolutely no sense. Also, the secondary plot with Cameron and Terminal Lung Cancer Man failed to register emotionally. At all. Felt like a rehash of the time she argued what TLCM was arguing--that if a person dies s/he should be remembered, that someone should care--about the young woman who also had terminal cancer. Eh. I think this would have worked better as a season premiere than a post-Tritter episode, what with the theme of meaning and rationality and House’s somewhat reluctant decision to try to connect with someone. The lovely river setting would have been appropriate then as well.
Not surprised, but still disappointed that after everything they just went through, Wilson and House seem to be back to normal, or what serves as normal for both of them. House may have told him that nothing changed, and so far it seems to be true, but something must have. Something must have.
The funny: The opening, with “Perjurer”/“Felon” and the three latex gloves and the crazy man running around clutching his head (decoy PotW!), and the false-hiccups patient trying to get House to feel him up, and Wilson saying “I don’t want to be you” in the role-playing scenario. And the part where House told Wilson the park was the last place Cuddy would look for him and my sister said, “But Wilson found youuuu!”
The unfunny: The abuse by his father. It certainly sounded as if House had never told anyone until now. In one sense, it’s going to make those moments in “Daddy’s Boy” and “Son of Coma Guy” and whenever else House mentioned his father more poignant and disturbing. In another sense, it’s disappointing to learn about, because it takes the subtlety and ambiguity out of his troubled relationship with his father; his complex no longer arises solely from a clash of personalities and a desire to be right than with lingering fear and animosity for physical abuse. Hm. I won’t say it explains a lot--definitely won’t say “it explains everything,” because we know what that means on the show. We were doing fine analyzing House with all the given information, and this... doesn’t feel like a missing puzzle piece.
Moving on.
Monogrammed handkerchief with blood spot from successfully bribed clinic patient: David Shore’s? (It had “D.S.” stitched on it.)
Foosball makes a comeback! As did a number of echoes from “Damned If You Do”: Cuddy entering a scene with House and Wilson relaxing together and telling him, “You did good”; girl’s/House’s “I don’t want to talk about it”/ “Neither do I”; and talk about whether everything happens to you because it’s God’s will. Very little Chase, again, in an episode where it would have been appropriate for him to be around.
ETA 11 p.m.: You know what was interesting? That when Wilson was trying to convince House to tell the girl the truth, the first (and only) example he gives of House's trauma was the shooting. Not the leg.
ETA Wed.: You know what else I liked? House eliciting three equally plausible explanations from Foreman, Chase and Cameron that "explain everything" and then declaring his own diagnosis. Not only does it feature teacher!House and demonstrate that each of the fellows has learned enough to produce a complicated and obscure diagnosis (albeit with a bit of extra coaxing for Cameron), it also harks back to his conversation with Cuddy in... "Damned If You Do"? that their current diagnosis explains everything, and if it turns out to be wrong, they'll find another one that explains everything. That's one of the great things about his job, about medicine and about the show; just because there's a clear answer at first doesn't mean it's the right clear answer, and with trial and dramatic error they (almost) always (eventually) reach the correct conclusion.
And... I think that’s all for now, folks. Apologies in advance for the expected delay in comment replies and review-reading. To contradict the great philosopher Jagger, time is not on my side.
HL: You’re only dressing up because you’re worried I’ll stop paying attention to you now that I’ve won all these awards for my brilliant acting talent.
RSL: ...
HL: You do look hot in it, though.
Hey, has anyone ever done an MST of an episode as a review? Like with House and Wilson providing commentary? That could be fun.
Ambivalent about tonight’s ep, in the same way I was ambivalent about “Words and Deeds”--not bad, not top-tier. The different format was way beyond due, so that was very nice, with everyone able to take their time and talk without a diagnostic clock ticking, and no last-minute miracle diagnosis to serve as a conclusion. It shared “Son of Coma Guy”’s focus on conversation and character revelation, only here I had a harder time telling what was profound and what made absolutely no sense. Also, the secondary plot with Cameron and Terminal Lung Cancer Man failed to register emotionally. At all. Felt like a rehash of the time she argued what TLCM was arguing--that if a person dies s/he should be remembered, that someone should care--about the young woman who also had terminal cancer. Eh. I think this would have worked better as a season premiere than a post-Tritter episode, what with the theme of meaning and rationality and House’s somewhat reluctant decision to try to connect with someone. The lovely river setting would have been appropriate then as well.
Not surprised, but still disappointed that after everything they just went through, Wilson and House seem to be back to normal, or what serves as normal for both of them. House may have told him that nothing changed, and so far it seems to be true, but something must have. Something must have.
The funny: The opening, with “Perjurer”/“Felon” and the three latex gloves and the crazy man running around clutching his head (decoy PotW!), and the false-hiccups patient trying to get House to feel him up, and Wilson saying “I don’t want to be you” in the role-playing scenario. And the part where House told Wilson the park was the last place Cuddy would look for him and my sister said, “But Wilson found youuuu!”
The unfunny: The abuse by his father. It certainly sounded as if House had never told anyone until now. In one sense, it’s going to make those moments in “Daddy’s Boy” and “Son of Coma Guy” and whenever else House mentioned his father more poignant and disturbing. In another sense, it’s disappointing to learn about, because it takes the subtlety and ambiguity out of his troubled relationship with his father; his complex no longer arises solely from a clash of personalities and a desire to be right than with lingering fear and animosity for physical abuse. Hm. I won’t say it explains a lot--definitely won’t say “it explains everything,” because we know what that means on the show. We were doing fine analyzing House with all the given information, and this... doesn’t feel like a missing puzzle piece.
Moving on.
Monogrammed handkerchief with blood spot from successfully bribed clinic patient: David Shore’s? (It had “D.S.” stitched on it.)
Foosball makes a comeback! As did a number of echoes from “Damned If You Do”: Cuddy entering a scene with House and Wilson relaxing together and telling him, “You did good”; girl’s/House’s “I don’t want to talk about it”/ “Neither do I”; and talk about whether everything happens to you because it’s God’s will. Very little Chase, again, in an episode where it would have been appropriate for him to be around.
ETA 11 p.m.: You know what was interesting? That when Wilson was trying to convince House to tell the girl the truth, the first (and only) example he gives of House's trauma was the shooting. Not the leg.
ETA Wed.: You know what else I liked? House eliciting three equally plausible explanations from Foreman, Chase and Cameron that "explain everything" and then declaring his own diagnosis. Not only does it feature teacher!House and demonstrate that each of the fellows has learned enough to produce a complicated and obscure diagnosis (albeit with a bit of extra coaxing for Cameron), it also harks back to his conversation with Cuddy in... "Damned If You Do"? that their current diagnosis explains everything, and if it turns out to be wrong, they'll find another one that explains everything. That's one of the great things about his job, about medicine and about the show; just because there's a clear answer at first doesn't mean it's the right clear answer, and with trial and dramatic error they (almost) always (eventually) reach the correct conclusion.
And... I think that’s all for now, folks. Apologies in advance for the expected delay in comment replies and review-reading. To contradict the great philosopher Jagger, time is not on my side.
no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 03:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 03:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 03:53 am (UTC)I wasn't thrilled with the abuse revelation, either. Much too simplistic an explanation, IMHO. I predict waves of bad fanfic focusing on Abused!House.
no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 04:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 03:59 am (UTC)Wilson looked especially cute tonight, I must say! We got three nice H/W scenes; I am so very, very grateful.
no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 04:00 am (UTC)In my mind, I choose to believe that House pulled a double-blind and was lying about it being his father. She wouldn't think he'd lie twice, right? So all the more reason to do it. I take his comment about "one day, one room" as his way of saying he's never going to talk to her again so she doesn't find out he duped her into talking.
no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 04:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 04:10 am (UTC)That was my instinctive reaction to it as well. It just seemed a more House-like thing to do.
The "one day, one room" remark definitely can be interpreted as saying that meaning is situational: that is, what House said in that room (or park) during that day is not necessarily true, but what she needed to hear.
no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 04:04 am (UTC)I agree that the father abuse thing was a little...off. But the way I see it, the whole idea of strict discipline and never telling his son he was right seemed to fit together with our image of this controlling military father. I think it explains a lot about why House is so emotionally repressed, as well. It did, however, clash a bit with our first encounter with House and his parents, but I suppose that's to be expected since they didn't plot this far ahead.
Cameron's storyline seemed incomplete. I felt like they'd cut scenes from it, because I was waiting for some big connection or further insight into her relationship with her husband. But I really liked the ethics and philosophy debates - I guess that's one of those things you either enjoy, or you don't particularly care either way for.
Scenery in the park was gorgeous. I hope they do more outside scenes like that. And how about Wilson being able to spot the "sightseer" male joggers, eh? XD XD Oh, House and Wilson...still got a bit of that college mentality *grin*
no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 12:40 am (UTC)You're right that House's father as strict disciplinarian fits with both his and House's characters as we've seen them so far -- even the scenes in "Daddy's Boy," I think. The revelation just seemed unnecessary; we've already got plenty to chew on with the infarction and shooting, and IMO his strained relationship with John didn't need this added drama to be interesting or believable. Still, I'm more than willing to give the writers the benefit of the doubt and see where they take it.
no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 04:49 am (UTC)I think that the clash of personalities and values is still part of it, and that the abuse came from that, but also exascerbatd it (vicious cycle kind of thing).
Of course I don't want to say that it "explains everything" but I do think it fits. House has a fearful, antagonistic view of the world (he's a Type Five (http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/TypeFiveOverview.asp) (with a definite Six (http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/TypeSixOverview.asp) wing) and our parents give us our foundation for how we perceive the world.
Shrug.
I liked parts of this episode, though overall didn't love it. But honestly, despite how much I love the show on the whole, there are very few individual episodes that don't dislike things about. I did really like that discussion about eternity and which way makes things matter and stuff, though.
no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 02:36 pm (UTC)It would be more interesting if it was his grandmother.
no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 03:07 pm (UTC)The grandmother would have been less expected anyway.
no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 12:45 am (UTC)Yes, that is true. It's the "more extreme" factor that irked me. House already has plenty of drama in his life, both current and past. The abuse struck me as an answer to the ages-old question, "What other terrible thing can we do to our hero?" Of course, it does help explain how House got to be the way he is, but there could have been other, subtler decisions made in fleshing out his backstory.
no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 01:35 am (UTC)To be honest, House's father having been abusive makes more sense to me than a random guy walking into House's office and shooting him. That just seems pointless and unrealistic - especially since nothing ever really came of it at all. Couldn't they have just made the entire thing be dream, including the shooting? I suppose it would have needed something to prompt it, but, couldn't they have come up with anything better?
I guess the father doesn't bother me as much because I've speculated about it a lot before. I'm really a huge fan of gen fic, and House's family is one of my favorite subjects. Seriously - my favorite things to read in this fandom are House+family, House/Wilson, or occassionally House/Stacy (and Wilson+family, though there's very little of that). In that order, probably. I didn't think about the relationship with his father as being blatantly abusive really, but with somewhat abusive overtones to it... Overbearing, certainly, and distant. There are good fics out there that have dealt with it, and handled John realistically, and this new information doesn't necessarily refute any of that.
no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 04:59 am (UTC)I do believe House's story of "abuse" by his dad was true (I will explain why I put abuse in quotes below). Sometimes it is easier to reveal something painful and personal to a complete stranger. I chose to interpret House's final "one day, one room" at the end as his statement that he'll never see her again, so his secret will be safe with her; similar to the way Gabe took House's secrets to the grave in SoCG.
his complex no longer arises solely from a clash of personalities and a desire to be right than with lingering fear and animosity for physical abuse
The clash of personalities still underpins everything however. And I'm--actually OK with House's explanation because it fits with the prevailing conservative culture at that time.
People have to realize/remember that back in the late 50s/early 60s, corporal punishment was entirely acceptable. Back then, parental authority was absolute. Today we'd consider it totally unfair, extreme and abusive. But back then, the prevailing culture probably would have supported John's choice of punishment for whatever transgressions resulted in ice baths or sleeping in the yard. For example, if you misbehaved at school, not only would you likely get your hands slapped with a ruler by the teacher, but also you would go home and receive a belt-whipping by your father. (I have this on an extremely reliable source.)
That view would also have been magnified by the military culture that the House family lived under. House may have been a child in the 1960s, but he was a military brat, which would have been far more conservative than the rest of society. Add to that the clash of personalities, plus my suspicion that John was probably terrified by House's extreme giftedness, and didn't know what to do about it. So he dealt with House the only way he knew how.
In
Not to defend John, but he probably felt he was perfectly justified, given the culture and mores and values of the time. House of course didn't see it that way and we wouldn't either, because times have changed. It's all in how you interpret it.
Enough grumping--House is on the Western feed in 2 minutes. Time to depress myself again. *shrugs*
no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 02:31 pm (UTC)The fact that Wilson wasn't there is something else that I'm using to convince myself House was lying. House was so willing to answer anything about himself with Wilson there, I think he'd want Wilson there to hear (or "accidentally" overhear) the story.
I can justify anything, though. Given a few minutes, I could probably come up with some rational-sounding reason why House's story was really about his relationship with Stacy, or House's way of admitting he has a son he's not allowed to see.
no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 06:34 pm (UTC)I knew in the hospital when House first talked about it he was partly lying, because he said he was left home with his grandmother; when we damn well knew he'd been to Egypt and Japan.
In the park though I'm convinced he wasn't lying, because when he said "It was my dad", I heard the tinest break in HL's voice at the end. That tiny break on the word "dad", the "oh God it hurts" implied in it, rang true. (And only boosts the awesomeness of HL's acting ability to the level of the universe...)
no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 05:36 pm (UTC)I felt that this storyline worked. Although I'm bracing myself for the Tsunami of Bad!fic and I'm aware that a lot of people will take the oversimplified view and say, "oh, he was an abused kid and that explains how he is." When in fact it's just one piece of the puzzle. I've known a few formerly abused kids and they aren't all the same. Some of them have responded to their past by becoming extremely compassionate and kind adults.
However, the one I knew (dated for a long time in fact) who was most like House was, as it happens, the one who had an abusive father who had made him feel absolutely rejected. (Interestingly enough, this guy also had a sort of Wilson, a best friend several years younger, much more likeable and stable, who would do almost anything for him and whose stubborn friendship was the most valued thing in my ex's life).
My Dad, a kind and gentle soul if ever there was one, would use his belt on our butts if he felt the situation called for that (it was a very rare thing). My brother and I were not damaged by this because we knew why he did it and we always knew we were loved. Had he ever done either of the things House mentioned, though, I'm sure we'd have been scarred for life. To put a kid in an ice water bath (I've never even HEARD of anyone doing this) or out into the yard for the night--that's got a feel of rejection about it that's just devastating.
The fact that House's father resorted to such horrible tactics does not, in my mind, mean that he's just evil, no matter what the Bad!Fic authors are certain to say. I'll second what Topaz said about the situation. John House did some very, very bad things because he was angry and clueless and frustrated, and probably very fearful. Not because he was Satan's henchman.
no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 03:26 am (UTC)You would think fans of the show would know that no single factor ever "explains everything"....
I agree with what you and Topaz have said about John's motivations and the context of the times. Such punishment, or mistreatment, or abuse, or whatever it may have been, does fit with what we know of House and his father, and helps -- helps -- explain how he got to be the way he is now. I just didn't think it was an entirely necessary bit of drama in the life of a character who's already been through so much. (Of course, he is the hero, so all the bad stuff gets dumped on him.)
But who knows -- the idea could be handled well and turn out to be one of the best character developments yet.
...Or it could be dropped like half the intriguing points brought up on the series. :)
no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 05:33 am (UTC)Or it could be dropped like half the intriguing points brought up on the series
That's another worry. They do have an annoying habit of doing that.
no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 02:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Jan. 31st, 2007 06:44 pm (UTC)House used to be extraordinary and brilliant, and now they've made House *normal* by throwing in the OMG!AbusedByDad bit. And I *hate* it.
I'm only watching because of HL and RSL these days, and that's really sad, 'cause the show used to send shivers along my spine.
no subject
Date: Feb. 2nd, 2007 09:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 3rd, 2007 01:41 am (UTC)I also loved the kid who had to take his own pulse and somehow came up with 26. The people I was watching with all laughed out loud at House's, "...Ok, either you suck at math or you're going to die in 2 seconds." 1... 2... "You suck at math."
no subject
Date: Feb. 2nd, 2007 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Feb. 2nd, 2007 10:50 pm (UTC)Then again, I felt this episode was a whole lot of nothing - wanting to touch on a lot of issues but too ADD to follow through with them thoroughly. It didn't have the good narrative tightness and complexity that other Shore episodes had. I'm thinking about 'Three Stories', which is still my favorite House episode to date. Compared to OD,OR, Three Stories was able to touch on and talk well about a number of very prominent issues. This episode was all over the place.
The thing that annoyed me most was the rape victim. And the general teatment of rape in general. Again, it was probably because this episode jumped around so much, and because whoever was the rape victim was a phenomally, phenomally bad actress. After she said 'I was raped' for about the third time I wanted to scream, YES WE GET IT NOW. Even if she is a fictional character, it feel morally right to dismiss a rape victim just like that. I also thought that the subject of rape just has far too much stigma that clouded the episode (as in, the rape needs to get resolved, not House's search for meaning, which was what clearly was supposed to be the prominent issue in this episode.) I don't understand why House would open up to the rape victim. Given her illogical thinking, I don't think he would have respected her enough to open up in such a way.
Gah, it was such a poorly written and acted episode, but for those wonderful House/Cuddy moment s and Wilson's roleplay line.